The three records everything else depends on

A risk without a control is a worry. A control without an owner is a hope. A control without evidence is an assertion. This is where the three are held together — and where every audit, review and buyer questionnaire draws its answers from.

One register, not one per standard

Most organisations do not have a risk problem; they have a traceability problem. The risks are known. What is missing is the line from a risk, to the control that addresses it, to the person accountable, to dated proof that it actually operated. Break that line and every downstream activity — audit, corrective action, management review, customer assurance — becomes manual work.

How the record is built

Risks with treatment, not just scores

Inherent and residual scoring, heatmaps, appetite thresholds and a treatment plan with dates — reviewed on a cycle rather than at audit time.

Controls mapped across standards

One control statement, mapped to ISO 9001, ISO/IEC 20000-1, ISO/IEC 27001 Annex A, ISO/IEC 42001 and Cyber Essentials wherever it applies.

Named owners and due dates

Accountability sits with a person. Reminders chase the owner until the work is closed.

Evidence with a freshness date

Screenshots, exports, reports and automated signals, each dated and attached to the control they prove.

Linked assets, systems and suppliers

Risks connect to the assets, systems and third parties they concern, so scope questions have answers.

Health monitoring over time

Control health shows what is operating, what is drifting and what has quietly lapsed since the last review.

The artefacts this register produces

Every artifact below is generated inside the workspace, versioned, timestamped and shareable via a signed link — no last-minute PDF assembly, no "wait, which version did I send them?"

Risk register export with inherent and residual scoring
Statement of Applicability with justifications
Control set with cross-standard mapping
Evidence pack per control, dated and versioned
Access review report
Corrective action log with root cause and closure evidence
Control health summary for management review
Supplier and third-party risk summary

Where it goes next

The register feeds the rest of the cycle: internal audits test it, corrective actions fix what fails, management review reads it, and buyer assurance answers customers from it.

Answers buyers, procurement and auditors want

What makes this different from a risk register in a spreadsheet?+

A spreadsheet holds the words. It cannot tell you whether a control operated last month, who owns it, which standards depend on it, or whether the evidence has gone stale. Those links are the point of the register here.

How is evidence kept current?+

Every piece of evidence carries a date and a review interval, so staleness is visible rather than discovered during an audit. Where a system is connected, configuration signals refresh automatically on a schedule.

Can one control satisfy several standards?+

Yes, and it should. A single access-review control can map to ISO/IEC 27001 Annex A, an ISO/IEC 20000-1 requirement and an ISO 9001 clause at once. You maintain it once and evidence it once.

How are risks scored?+

Likelihood and impact with a configurable scale, producing an inherent and residual position, a heatmap view and a treatment plan with owners and dates.

What happens when a control fails?+

The failure is explained in plain English, a prioritised remediation plan is produced, an owner and due date can be assigned, and the action can be pushed into your service desk if one is connected.

See how your existing risks, controls and evidence could become one integrated management system

Import what you have today and see the gaps, the duplicates and the unowned controls in one view.

Prefer a conversation? Email hello@iso-standard.app — a practitioner responds within one business day.

AI-enabled — privacy-respecting

AI does the drafting. You keep the control — and the data.

How we handle data →
  • AI that assists — not replaces

    Assisted drafting for policies, risks, controls and buyer questionnaires. Every AI suggestion is reviewed and approved by you before it lands in the record.

  • Opt-in, workspace-scoped

    AI features run only when you invoke them, only against the workspace you're in. We never mine your data to answer someone else's prompt.

  • Your data stays yours

    Prompts routed via the AI Gateway to model providers whose API terms exclude your content from model training. Nothing is sold or shared for advertising.

  • Isolated by design

    Row-level security enforces workspace boundaries at the database. MFA, SSO, audit logs and least-privilege roles govern who sees what.

We never sell personal information, never share it for advertising, and never use your workspace content to train third-party models. Full sub-processor list and Acceptable Use Policy on the Trust page.

MM
Michael McCarroll
Founder · 25+ years
IT governance · Information security · AI
Why this platform exists

Enterprise-grade governance — built for the SMEs and consultants enterprise GRC forgets.

I've spent 25 years in corporate governance — aligning technology, controls and compliance with what the business is actually trying to do. Time and again, the same pattern: the organisations that win new clients aren't the ones with the biggest GRC budget. They're the ones who can demonstrate trust on demand. This platform is the tool I wanted for the SMEs and consultants I've worked with — institutional-grade governance without an institutional price tag, built on the way audits and buyer reviews actually happen.